The best way to understand
your content is by auditing it. It's a simple process of taking out that digital clipboard to tick what
you’ve got and what you need.
While there are several
purely quantitative methods (content age or visitation), a content audit is the
best way to test those opinions like "All our content is stale" or
"No-one ever uses our content". It gives you the hard evidence that equips you
for content improvement, migration or even killing off large parts of your website.
Time to give your content a check up? (Image via pixabay) |
Creating the Content Inventory
The first step is to create
the content inventory. This term is used variously but here it refers to the raw
information before it has been analysed and it usually comes from a reporting
engine (and even just a report from your CMS). If you've done a content audit
before, you'll know this as The Hellish Spreadsheet. It will take you through every
page on your site - and that's a good thing.
Throughout this whole
process, keep in mind that this is unearthing problems your users have been
putting up with for years. Or worse - they're not putting up with them and
going somewhere else. Doing a detailed content audit is a no-pain, no-gain
process but, just like hitting the gym regularly, you'll appreciate it come
swimsuit season.
There are plenty of tools
for generating The Hellish Spreadsheet. Try Screaming Frog's SEO Spider (free for less than 500 pages), or URLProfiler (reasonably
priced with great features for SEO).
To ROT or TRACC?
What you'll get from these spreadsheet
tools is the raw data to analyse: page name, URLs and location in the IA are
common attributes. But the real work is in applying criteria to see what's really
valuable on your site. The most common criteria are ROT (Redundant, Out-of-Date or Trivial) which was pioneered by Rick Allen from Meet Content
in 2011.
At RMIT University, we
started with the ROT criteria but had a few other things to consider. For
starters, no stakeholder wants to hear that their content is 'trivial'. So we
came up with TRACC:
Timely - is the content likely to be especially useful at
particular points of the year?
Relevant - does this content support a user need?
Current - is this the most up-to-date information?
Compelling - does it engage users and meet principles of good
web writing?
As with any criteria, they
range in their subjectivity, but by and large these criteria worked for the
content and the audience. They gave RMIT's web transformation criteria to help migrate
to a new CMS and understand how content needed to be re-worked and maintained.
A content audit's most important analytic
Analysis is nothing without
follow up, so the most important column on any content audit is: Action. Here is
where you make the tough decision about what to keep, kill or improve.
Keep: This
means you need to maintain this content - check its currency and see if it is
still relevant to your user. Look out for content that is described as
"set and forget". This usually means it has been created without any
thought for change. It’s easy to get lazy with your content. But your
users expect up to date content and look to your website as the authority on
your organisation.
Kill: It
sounds easy - but there’s more to killing than hitting delete. Consider
in-bound links to the content or the timeliness that might mean it is the most
important content at a particular time of year. For student users it might be an
assignment coversheet that sees no traffic for months, then breaks the server
the night before a submission date.
Comments
Post a Comment